If the new Fundraising Regulator is bent on imposing damaging and impractical rules, David Pearce argues that its charities’ duty to walk away from self-regulationContinue reading OPINION: If the FPS is forced on the sector, charities should walk away from ‘self’-regulation
Adrian Sargeant has read the consultation document on how the Fundraising Preference Service might operate. He’s found quite a bit wrong with it.Continue reading OPINION: The Fundraising Preference Service – a monologue with stakeholders
Rogare advisory panel members Amanda Shepard and Adrian Salmon report on the meeting we co-hosted with nfpSynergy this month to discuss fundraising regulation.Continue reading NEWS: Listening to fundraisers to make regulation work
There’s been a lot of criticism of the proposed Fundraising Preference Service, but little of that has been directed at how the FPS could work in practice. Joe Jenkins outlines 17 possibilities.
It’s up to the sector to make the FPS work and failure is not an option. Ian MacQuillin says fundraisers will be damned if they do and damned if they don’t.Continue reading OPINION: Dare you pick up the poisoned chalice of the FPS?
Concerns that fundraisers’ fears about the Fundraising Preference Service (FPS) are not being adequately represented have led to research consultancy nfpSynergy and fundraising think tank Rogare to host a forum for fundraisers to express their views.Continue reading NEWS: nfpSynergy and Rogare to provide fundraisers with forum to discuss FPS
The results of Rogare’s survey of fundraisers’ opinions on proposed regulatory reform to fundraising, especially the provision of the Fundraising Preference Service, are now available to download.Continue reading NEWS: Survey reveals fundraisers’ attitudes to the Fundraising Preference Service