
Craig Linton offers his reflections on Rogare’s relationship fundraising review and recommends the direction we should be moving in.
Continue reading NEW IDEAS: Relationship fundraising – so where should we go next?
Craig Linton offers his reflections on Rogare’s relationship fundraising review and recommends the direction we should be moving in.
Continue reading NEW IDEAS: Relationship fundraising – so where should we go next?Rogare advisory panel members Amanda Shepard and Adrian Salmon report on the meeting we co-hosted with nfpSynergy this month to discuss fundraising regulation.
Continue reading NEWS: Listening to fundraisers to make regulation workThere’s been a lot of criticism of the proposed Fundraising Preference Service, but little of that has been directed at how the FPS could work in practice. Joe Jenkins outlines 17 possibilities.
It’s up to the sector to make the FPS work and failure is not an option. Ian MacQuillin says fundraisers will be damned if they do and damned if they don’t.
Continue reading OPINION: Dare you pick up the poisoned chalice of the FPS?The full findings of Rogare’s review of relationship fundraising will be published on 26 January 2016 and available as PDF downloads from a website that’s currently under construction.
Continue reading NEWS: Rogare’s relationship fundraising review to be published in January 2016Concerns that fundraisers’ fears about the Fundraising Preference Service (FPS) are not being adequately represented have led to research consultancy nfpSynergy and fundraising think tank Rogare to host a forum for fundraisers to express their views.
Continue reading NEWS: nfpSynergy and Rogare to provide fundraisers with forum to discuss FPSThe results of Rogare’s survey of fundraisers’ opinions on proposed regulatory reform to fundraising, especially the provision of the Fundraising Preference Service, are now available to download.
Continue reading NEWS: Survey reveals fundraisers’ attitudes to the Fundraising Preference ServiceThe current debate about charity regulation is progressing without listening to the voices of one of its most important stakeholders. Zoë Bunter asks why no-one is considering what the effect will be on beneficiaries.
Continue reading OPINION: Where is the voice of the beneficiary?Fundraisers’ views on how their profession should respond to the proposed Fundraising Preference Service are being sought by Plymouth University’s fundraising think tank, Rogare.
Continue reading NEWS: What should the fundraising profession do about the Fundraising Preference Service?Fundraisers’ sense of themselves as moral individuals is damaged by having to make the difficult ethical decisions they encounter every day in their jobs, new research conducted by Plymouth University’s Centre for Sustainable Philanthropy (CSP) has revealed.
Continue reading KNOWLEDGE: The effect of ethical decision making on fundraisers’ sense of moral identity